<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cost of Prairie Restoration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/</link>
	<description>simple ways to grow your garden</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 05:48:34 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2267</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2267</guid>
		<description>Judy, you&#039;ve given me an idea. I&#039;m pretty sure that at least some people who grab for pesticides probably never read about alternatives. I&#039;m going to consider writing some articles about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy, you&#8217;ve given me an idea. I&#8217;m pretty sure that at least some people who grab for pesticides probably never read about alternatives. I&#8217;m going to consider writing some articles about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judyofthewoods</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2265</link>
		<dc:creator>judyofthewoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2265</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying about the burning. I guess, it makes sense, and fire is natural anyway, and as you say, sometimes a necessity for some plants to thrive. Certainly a necessity in some forests, as dramatic as it may seem. I suspect that ashes also help to balance the pH of the soil. 

The toxic chemicals, on the other hand, make me cringe, and I don&#039;t think I could ever condone them, unless  perhaps there was a natural, biodegradable type, as permethrin is for insects - toxic in the short term but ultimately it will degrade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying about the burning. I guess, it makes sense, and fire is natural anyway, and as you say, sometimes a necessity for some plants to thrive. Certainly a necessity in some forests, as dramatic as it may seem. I suspect that ashes also help to balance the pH of the soil. </p>
<p>The toxic chemicals, on the other hand, make me cringe, and I don&#8217;t think I could ever condone them, unless  perhaps there was a natural, biodegradable type, as permethrin is for insects &#8211; toxic in the short term but ultimately it will degrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2256</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2256</guid>
		<description>Dropping herbicides from airplanes scares me! Herbicide use in prairie restoration is spot-treatment using test-proven herbicides (different ones for different invasives) with hand-held equipment. These herbicides are expensive - it would make no sense to spray a whole field, never mind to spray from an airplane.

I had to go off and read about phragmites. Sounds like that is a whole other scale of problem compared to invasives in prairies. We really have made a mess of our environment in even more ways than I realized. I&#039;ve got to be with you Carole in your campaign to raise awareness of the negative effects of invasive plants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dropping herbicides from airplanes scares me! Herbicide use in prairie restoration is spot-treatment using test-proven herbicides (different ones for different invasives) with hand-held equipment. These herbicides are expensive &#8211; it would make no sense to spray a whole field, never mind to spray from an airplane.</p>
<p>I had to go off and read about phragmites. Sounds like that is a whole other scale of problem compared to invasives in prairies. We really have made a mess of our environment in even more ways than I realized. I&#8217;ve got to be with you Carole in your campaign to raise awareness of the negative effects of invasive plants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carole</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2255</link>
		<dc:creator>Carole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 04:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2255</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m of two minds also. I cringe every year when the local national wildlife refuges drop tons of herbicide from airplanes to control the phragmites. Recent research has shown that this is negatively impacting frogs, toads, and other amphibians.   

I have less of a problem with burning, especially in prairie situations because fire was an integral part of maintaining the prairie in that state instead of going through the normal process of succession to shrubland then woodland.

Sometimes we have to choose the method that causes the least amount of damage instead of having a best method. The work of restoration is extremely hard and very expensive, but in my mind it is absolutely necessary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m of two minds also. I cringe every year when the local national wildlife refuges drop tons of herbicide from airplanes to control the phragmites. Recent research has shown that this is negatively impacting frogs, toads, and other amphibians.   </p>
<p>I have less of a problem with burning, especially in prairie situations because fire was an integral part of maintaining the prairie in that state instead of going through the normal process of succession to shrubland then woodland.</p>
<p>Sometimes we have to choose the method that causes the least amount of damage instead of having a best method. The work of restoration is extremely hard and very expensive, but in my mind it is absolutely necessary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2254</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 03:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2254</guid>
		<description>&quot;What I am in two minds about is the use of toxic chemicals and burning to achieve it.&quot;

I agree with you on the pesticide aspect. Actually I was a little surprised that the Overland Park Arboretum used chemicals. But I&#039;ve read a fair bit about best practices in prairie restoration. Some invasives can be controlled by techniques such as digging, mowing and burning. Other invasives get worse with mowing, grazing, or burning. Organic control methods tend to be very time critical and labor intensive. Either they didn&#039;t have the labor available, or they didn&#039;t consider it worth the extra work to do non-chemical control.

There are all kinds of rules about using equipment in fields that contain invasives too, for instance all equipment brought in needs to be thoroughly cleaned so that seeds of invasives don&#039;t spread to the next place that piece of equipment is used. It can make mowing as a control method challenging.

Burning may sound pretty drastic, but actually it&#039;s a natural part of the prairie life-cyle. Burning favors prairie plants and grasses, which emerge later in spring than annuals and many of the invasives. Also some of the prairie seeds actually require the heat of burning before they will germinate. Field burning is considered a best practice in prairie restoration. Over a number of years it helps to restore the prairie, though some invasives take more than a decade to control through burning. Again, timing is very critical. With just a small window of 10 days or so each spring to take care of burning there may only be a couple of days with the right conditions. It&#039;s tricky to have people, wind speed and direction, temperature, and humidity all coincide before a field becomes too green to burn successfully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What I am in two minds about is the use of toxic chemicals and burning to achieve it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree with you on the pesticide aspect. Actually I was a little surprised that the Overland Park Arboretum used chemicals. But I&#8217;ve read a fair bit about best practices in prairie restoration. Some invasives can be controlled by techniques such as digging, mowing and burning. Other invasives get worse with mowing, grazing, or burning. Organic control methods tend to be very time critical and labor intensive. Either they didn&#8217;t have the labor available, or they didn&#8217;t consider it worth the extra work to do non-chemical control.</p>
<p>There are all kinds of rules about using equipment in fields that contain invasives too, for instance all equipment brought in needs to be thoroughly cleaned so that seeds of invasives don&#8217;t spread to the next place that piece of equipment is used. It can make mowing as a control method challenging.</p>
<p>Burning may sound pretty drastic, but actually it&#8217;s a natural part of the prairie life-cyle. Burning favors prairie plants and grasses, which emerge later in spring than annuals and many of the invasives. Also some of the prairie seeds actually require the heat of burning before they will germinate. Field burning is considered a best practice in prairie restoration. Over a number of years it helps to restore the prairie, though some invasives take more than a decade to control through burning. Again, timing is very critical. With just a small window of 10 days or so each spring to take care of burning there may only be a couple of days with the right conditions. It&#8217;s tricky to have people, wind speed and direction, temperature, and humidity all coincide before a field becomes too green to burn successfully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: judyofthewoods</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>judyofthewoods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 02:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>I feel cost can never be put into question when it comes to restoring natural habitat. We have takes so much, that we must return to nature. What I am in two mind about is the use of toxic chemicals and burning to achieve it. It is a dilemma when invasive plants have to be removed, but wonder if there are perhaps organic methods of doing it. Still, I welcome restoration work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel cost can never be put into question when it comes to restoring natural habitat. We have takes so much, that we must return to nature. What I am in two mind about is the use of toxic chemicals and burning to achieve it. It is a dilemma when invasive plants have to be removed, but wonder if there are perhaps organic methods of doing it. Still, I welcome restoration work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservation Gardening Best of the Web #4 &#124; Conservation Gardening</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2252</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservation Gardening Best of the Web #4 &#124; Conservation Gardening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2252</guid>
		<description>[...] a thought provoking article about the cost of restoring habitat after we&#8217;ve destroyed it in Prairie Restoration, Is it worth it?. What do you think? Is the cost of restoration, of giving a little back to wildlife, worth [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a thought provoking article about the cost of restoring habitat after we&#8217;ve destroyed it in Prairie Restoration, Is it worth it?. What do you think? Is the cost of restoration, of giving a little back to wildlife, worth [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>Thanks Carole. Wow! I appreciate you choosing this article for &quot;Best of the Web&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Carole. Wow! I appreciate you choosing this article for &#8220;Best of the Web&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carole</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>Carole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>Alison: I&#039;m linking to this article in tomorrow&#039;s weekly &quot;Best of the Web&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison: I&#8217;m linking to this article in tomorrow&#8217;s weekly &#8220;Best of the Web&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/2009/09/the-cost-of-prairie-restoration/comment-page-1/#comment-2249</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lovingnaturesgarden.com/?p=1612#comment-2249</guid>
		<description>Wendy, we might wish land could just be left to recover. Sadly, it takes more than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy, we might wish land could just be left to recover. Sadly, it takes more than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

